"A Prince, Therefore, Must Have No Other Object or Thought, or Take Up Anything As His Profession, Except War and Its Rules and Discipline, For That Is The Only Art That Befits One Who Commands"

Confession: I am never in a million years going to remember all of the different historical "princes" that Machiavelli outlines as examples in The Prince. The only ones that I knew any amount about were Emperor Commodus (not gonna lie, I only know about him because of Gladiator, and Hollywood-creative-license-news-flash: Commodus did not kill his father. His father died from plague) and King Ferdinand of Spain (mostly because of his commission of Christopher Columbus to travel west in search of a trade route to Asia...and well, you know how that ended up. Plus, there was a Bugs Bunny cartoon that we used to watch when we were little, where he sings a song about Ferdinand. And "his good queen Isabella, gave the jewels to her fella..."). Similar to reading The Divine Comedy, I'm just not going to end up being a buff on ancient Italian history. Maybe some of it will stick, I hope.

So as background, Machiavelli described the contents of The Prince as "being an unembellished summary of his knowledge about the nature of princes and the actions of great men based not only on reading but real experience." Each chapter discusses different qualities or concepts for princes to follow and then uses historical examples to support.    

So in lieu of remembering the details of all of the historical leaders presented, it was easier for me to focus on the overall concepts presented in The Prince and the qualities that Machiavelli presented as being required for a prince's success. And even then, I think because most of the world doesn't live under a monarchy anymore with power being seized and overtaken, it was hard to connect with some of the concepts. For example, needing the prince to focus all of his energies on war seemed a bit antiquated to me. Maybe because our political make-up greatly differs from how it did in Italy 500 years ago, that not a lot about today's political system seemed to resemble that. And maybe, more than anything, I'm a little naive to think that it's not an issue, because I'm fortunate to live in a country where we do have strong armed forces and peace.

And in the end, I do now know what Machiavellian means from actually reading The Prince. The concept that the ends justify the means, even if immoral tactics are used to make that happen. And I can't say that I necessarily agree with the concept, because it seems as though it has been twisted as an excuse to forgive any manner of sins in selfish pursuits. I think someone who used that approach today and actually didn't think there was anything wrong with it would probably be considered a sociopath. Although it does sound a lot like Kwame...

So on I move to The Age of Innocence. I seriously need to have a movie day soon too. Most of the books I've read lately have movies that were made about them, and I just haven't gotten around to watching most of these yet. Today sounds like as good a day as any. 248 to go. Hoping my progress will speed up. Here's to making that happen.